View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Shuram Gudatetris Luxurator of In-Flux Crust Eruptions

 Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 682
Thanks: 22 Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
Location: Cameron, Missouri 12935 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
  

|
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:05 pm Post subject: Why did Mhoram DO THAT? |
|
|
At the beginning of The Illearth War, Covenant begs Mhoram to not put hurtloam on him, but Mhoram shrugs it off and violates his wishes anyway.
Why would he do that? The last time Mhoram saw Covenant, at the End of Lord Fouls Bane, he tried to force Covenant to take action, realized his folly, and asked for forgiveness. Mhoram realized that Covenant needed to be free to make his own decisions.
But the very next time he sees him, Mhoram throws all that out the window, decides that he knows what's best for Covenant, and forces health upon him. Mhoram doesn't seem like a person who forgets lessons learned. I don't get it.  _________________ Covenant is Linden Frankenstein's monster.
I maxed-out Tetris! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wayfriend whilom witling

 Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Posts: 19453
Thanks: 11 Thanked 228 Times in 210 Posts
Location: The world of the Bowling Green Massacre 45762 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:


|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They had summoned Covenant because they wanted to have every opportunity available to them which might help them win their war. "We summoned you, though we knew it might carry a cost hard for you to bear. We have sworn our service to the Land, and could not do otherwise." And Mhoram approved of this.
I imagine that they healed him with the same idea: yes, it puts Covenant out, but the Land's need is the utmost concern. What good is bringing him to the Land if he's too unhealthy to do anything?
But still, "The Land has no need of service which is not glad and free." They brought him to the Land so that he would be able to choose to help them. Which seems like a contradiction. But I think it's a matter of going so far, but not farther. Covenant can't choose to help them if he's not there, or if he is unwell for that matter. If they didn't summon him, then they would always believe that they could have done more to save the Land. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DrPaul Giantfriend
Joined: 18 Jun 2009 Posts: 459
Thanks: 3 Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
2466 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:

|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Two other points:
1. At the end of LFB the issue was whether to compel Covenant to act. At the start of TIW the issue was whether to heal Covenant's injuries.
2. Mhoram's actions in applying hurtloam at the start of TIW would have been in accordance with the collective decision of the Lords (and Wayfriend has already addressed this point). At the end of LFB Mhoram was making a spot judgment of his own. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wayfriend whilom witling

 Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Posts: 19453
Thanks: 11 Thanked 228 Times in 210 Posts
Location: The world of the Bowling Green Massacre 45762 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:


|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, the Lords clearly would take actions for which their was consensus where they would not take them unilaterally.
Which reminds me of something else I had intended to say, and forgot. Which is: Mhoram had come to understand how acute was the moral distress that using his ring caused Covenant. Hence, he relented. But Covenant clearly needed healing, and his protestations were only cynical. So: a matter of degree. AFAICT the Lords had no moral imperative to not heal people who refused their aid. And there is every indication that they consider what lays behind peoples words as much as their words themselves. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DrPaul Giantfriend
Joined: 18 Jun 2009 Posts: 459
Thanks: 3 Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
2466 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:

|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wayfriend wrote: | AFAICT the Lords had no moral imperative to not heal people who refused their aid. |
This was dramatically illustrated by their attempt to cure dhukka at the beginning of TIW. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mmurphy1968 Servant of the Land

 Joined: 21 Nov 2004 Posts: 3
Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA 7 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:

|
Posted: Sun Jul 09, 2017 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am currently re-reading the books and read that scene earlier today. Covenant had just collapsed because of a bout of vertigo and then fell unconscious. Maybe more was intended than I read into it but I simply saw it as Mhoram trying to help the best way he could. Since Covenant was out cold and was obviously bleeding (though not badly) in addition to them knowing "There is other ill at work in him" applying hurtloam seems no different than to me than you or I calling a doctor. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
High Lord Tolkien Excommunicated Member of THOOLAH

 Joined: 19 Oct 2004 Posts: 6927
Thanks: 14 Thanked 44 Times in 42 Posts
Location: Cape Cod, Mass 2431 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
 

|
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mmurphy1968 wrote: | I am currently re-reading the books and read that scene earlier today. Covenant had just collapsed because of a bout of vertigo and then fell unconscious. Maybe more was intended than I read into it but I simply saw it as Mhoram trying to help the best way he could. Since Covenant was out cold and was obviously bleeding (though not badly) in addition to them knowing "There is other ill at work in him" applying hurtloam seems no different than to me than you or I calling a doctor. |
That was always my take on it as well.
LM understood TC a lot more after he was summoned in IEW.
I suspect that had the summons finished in PtP HLM would have healed TC with something other than Hurtloam (even if they had it). _________________ http://thoolah.blogspot.com/
[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shadowbinding shoe The Gap Into Spam

Joined: 15 Mar 2008 Posts: 1455
Thanks: 1 Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts
2302 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
  

|
Posted: Tue Aug 08, 2017 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DrPaul wrote: | wayfriend wrote: | AFAICT the Lords had no moral imperative to not heal people who refused their aid. |
This was dramatically illustrated by their attempt to cure dhukka at the beginning of TIW. |
They did what they believed a hale and whole Dhukka would want. Theoretically a pre-leprosy or a unleproused Thomas Covenant with no fear of its return would thank them for their action even if the current tarnished Thomas Covenant called it a Wrong. It's an interesting moral question, do you give psychiatric drugs to a depressed person despite his objections for example? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DrPaul Giantfriend
Joined: 18 Jun 2009 Posts: 459
Thanks: 3 Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
2466 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:

|
Posted: Fri Aug 11, 2017 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is another way of looking at this. As far as the Lords were concerned, Covenant's illness and injury were real, but their healing of him would also be real. Covenant, on the other hand, does not - cannot allow himself to - believe that the healing would be real. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|