Kevin's Watch Forum Index
 HomeHome   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister   SearchSearch   ProfileProfile   FAQFAQ   StatisticsStatistics  SudokuSudoku   Phoogle MapPhoogle Map 
 AlbumAlbum StoresStores   StoresItems Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why did Mhoram DO THAT?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Kevin's Watch Forum Index -> The First and Second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Shuram Gudatetris
Luxurator of In-Flux Crust Eruptions

Male
Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 604

Thanks: 21
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts

Location: Cameron, Missouri
2589 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP

User Items:
1 Lego1 Translation1 Member of Linden's Army


PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:05 pm    Post subject: Why did Mhoram DO THAT? Reply with quote

At the beginning of The Illearth War, Covenant begs Mhoram to not put hurtloam on him, but Mhoram shrugs it off and violates his wishes anyway.

Why would he do that? The last time Mhoram saw Covenant, at the End of Lord Fouls Bane, he tried to force Covenant to take action, realized his folly, and asked for forgiveness. Mhoram realized that Covenant needed to be free to make his own decisions.

But the very next time he sees him, Mhoram throws all that out the window, decides that he knows what's best for Covenant, and forces health upon him. Mhoram doesn't seem like a person who forgets lessons learned. I don't get it. Confused
_________________
Covenant is Linden Frankenstein's monster.

I maxed-out Tetris!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Phoogle Map
wayfriend
whilom witling

Male
Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Posts: 18257

Thanks: 11
Thanked 186 Times in 173 Posts

Location: The world of the Bowling Green Massacre
40783 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP

User Items:


PostPosted: Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

They had summoned Covenant because they wanted to have every opportunity available to them which might help them win their war. "We summoned you, though we knew it might carry a cost hard for you to bear. We have sworn our service to the Land, and could not do otherwise." And Mhoram approved of this.

I imagine that they healed him with the same idea: yes, it puts Covenant out, but the Land's need is the utmost concern. What good is bringing him to the Land if he's too unhealthy to do anything?

But still, "The Land has no need of service which is not glad and free." They brought him to the Land so that he would be able to choose to help them. Which seems like a contradiction. But I think it's a matter of going so far, but not farther. Covenant can't choose to help them if he's not there, or if he is unwell for that matter. If they didn't summon him, then they would always believe that they could have done more to save the Land.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DrPaul
Giantfriend


Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 409

Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts


2233 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP

User Items:


PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two other points:

1. At the end of LFB the issue was whether to compel Covenant to act. At the start of TIW the issue was whether to heal Covenant's injuries.

2. Mhoram's actions in applying hurtloam at the start of TIW would have been in accordance with the collective decision of the Lords (and Wayfriend has already addressed this point). At the end of LFB Mhoram was making a spot judgment of his own.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wayfriend
whilom witling

Male
Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Posts: 18257

Thanks: 11
Thanked 186 Times in 173 Posts

Location: The world of the Bowling Green Massacre
40783 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP

User Items:


PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, the Lords clearly would take actions for which their was consensus where they would not take them unilaterally.

Which reminds me of something else I had intended to say, and forgot. Which is: Mhoram had come to understand how acute was the moral distress that using his ring caused Covenant. Hence, he relented. But Covenant clearly needed healing, and his protestations were only cynical. So: a matter of degree. AFAICT the Lords had no moral imperative to not heal people who refused their aid. And there is every indication that they consider what lays behind peoples words as much as their words themselves.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
DrPaul
Giantfriend


Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 409

Thanks: 3
Thanked 11 Times in 9 Posts


2233 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP

User Items:


PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2017 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wayfriend wrote:
AFAICT the Lords had no moral imperative to not heal people who refused their aid.


This was dramatically illustrated by their attempt to cure dhukka at the beginning of TIW.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Kevin's Watch Forum Index -> The First and Second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by Earthpower © Kevin's Watch