| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
I'm Murrin
But just as tasty.
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Posts: 13199
Thanks: 6
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
Location: North East, UK
5928 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Posts: 41528
Thanks: 47
Thanked 72 Times in 71 Posts
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
7297 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
 Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 5:01 am Post subject: |
 |
|
And people don't get it anyway. Schrödinger was arguing against the Copenhagen interpretation, according to which it is the act of measurement that collapses the probability waveform. (Well, he was pointing out a flaw in it.)
In other words, until you open the box, both probabilities exist equally in potential, and the cat is alive and dead.
Schrödinger was saying that it can't be both alive and dead, it must be one or the other.
--A
_________________
Don't believe everything you think.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peter
unfettered
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 1758
Thanks: 29
Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts
7122 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
The key word in your above post Avatar is 'exist'. Dou you mean they exist equally in possibility, or in reality. In possibility, well of course - my boss might be dallying with the secretaary or he might be dictating a letter and I won't find out which till I open the door - or in reality which is much harder to visualise ie a sort of 'take this dictation Miss Jones..... (no I'm not even going to go down that road!  )
NB I'm using a macro example as Shrodinger did but I know we are talking quantum stuff here, now at least. But what I'm really after is just to know what we are supposed to learn from te thought experiment - a succinct explicit statement "Shrodingers 'cat in the box thought experiment teaches us that.........." This type of thing so my simple head can go " Ahh yea. I get that.
_________________
http://jhfv.blogspot.co.uk/
....and the glory of the world becomes less than it was....
'Have we not served you well'
'Of course - you know you have.'
'Then let it end.'
We are the Bloodguard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I'm Murrin
But just as tasty.
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Posts: 13199
Thanks: 6
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
Location: North East, UK
5928 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Joined: 01 Dec 2002
Posts: 16067
Thanks: 77
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
87 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
  
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just watched the Quantum Mechanics episode of that Brian Greene series. It helped me a whole lot. Some very interesting ideas! (Is that what they call an understatement?)
| Quote: | | Finally, a physicist named Max Born came up with a new and revolutionary idea for what the wave equation described. Born said the wave is not a smeared-out electron, or anything else previously encountered in science. Instead, he declared it's something that's really peculiar. A probability wave. |
The basis of reality isn't a particle or a wave, but a probability!?
And how about that crazy entanglement stuff!  I think Z mentioned this in my Paradox thread in the Close? Utterly insane stuff. And it says the only thing standing in the way of Clauser and a PhD in Astrophysics was his grade in QM. Then, he just happened to stumble across a paper by Bell. And he ended up building a machine that proved Bohr was right and Einstein wrong - that measuring does determine the spin, and the spin of the entangled particle; and the spins were not determined all along, and simple learned by measuring.
But I'll tell you something. If they do ever come up with that transporter for people, I'm not stepping into it! I don't care if a duplicate in every way comes out the other end, I'm still dying on this end!
_________________
We are not required to save the world. We are required to stand up as truly as we can for what we love. -SRD
Mi alasharia la shantih, Darling Silezia.
Isaiah ShadowLurker, mi alasharia la shantih, shantih. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I'm Murrin
But just as tasty.
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Posts: 13199
Thanks: 6
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
Location: North East, UK
5928 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Fist and Faith wrote: | | But I'll tell you something. If they do ever come up with that transporter for people, I'm not stepping into it! I don't care if a duplicate in every way comes out the other end, I'm still dying on this end! |
You know, I thought a lot about this one a few weeks back. I don't think it matters. There's certainly an existential fear, there, but really when you consider that you're nothing more than a biological machine, and that your self is an expression of its functions; and you consider that in reality every moment a past self ceases to exist and the present self replaces it, then copying yourself in such a way is no different, because what matters is not true continuity of the self, but the possession of a perception of continuity in the self that results.
_________________
Inspiration Struck. - I review books weekly!
Mod of the General Fantasy/Sci-Fi Forum, home of the Kevin's Watch Book Club.
Heart of God |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Joined: 01 Dec 2002
Posts: 16067
Thanks: 77
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
87 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But we can't know what perception we'll have. If it works as they think it will, the copy will certainly have that perception of continuity, and feel like it had been the original all along.
But the original might feel itself die. Or look at it this way. Maybe we could find a way to preserve the original, and have two of me running around. Could we kill the original? The copy has the true continuity anyway, so no harm done?
Edit: This conversation sounds familiar. Has it taken place at the Watch?
_________________
We are not required to save the world. We are required to stand up as truly as we can for what we love. -SRD
Mi alasharia la shantih, Darling Silezia.
Isaiah ShadowLurker, mi alasharia la shantih, shantih. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Joined: 01 Dec 2002
Posts: 16067
Thanks: 77
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
87 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh! And quantum computers! Heh
_________________
We are not required to save the world. We are required to stand up as truly as we can for what we love. -SRD
Mi alasharia la shantih, Darling Silezia.
Isaiah ShadowLurker, mi alasharia la shantih, shantih. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vraith
you're Dark Blue, stained..
Joined: 21 Nov 2008
Posts: 6387
Thanks: 15
Thanked 59 Times in 57 Posts
Location: everywhere, all the time
12611 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
  
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fist and Faith wrote: | find a way to preserve the original, and have two of me running around. Could we kill the original? The copy has the true continuity anyway, so no harm done?
Edit: This conversation sounds familiar. Has it taken place at the Watch? |
I know somewhere I mentioned a play about just this [in part, it dealt with a number of identity issues] called "On Ego."
They can teleport...but really it isn't the matter that moves, it's the information. The departing one is supposed to disintegrate, but once in a while it malfunctions and they end up with two that both think they're the real one. The one that was supposed to have "departed" they have to kill...because s/he is the mistake...the arrival "copy" is, just as you say, the continuous one because is what was supposed to happen.
BTW, another problem for Standard Mode from LHC, possibly. Matter and antimatter siblings decay in different ways way more than they're supposed to. They need more data, but it's trending that direction.
_________________
The ONLY value of universal characters is that they help us, by reasoning, to know new truths about individual things.
I always had a repulsive need to be something more than human.
I just want something I can never have.
As was his language so was his life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peter
unfettered
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 1758
Thanks: 29
Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts
7122 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
| Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There's been a lot of fuss of late about this buisiness of neutrinos travelling faster than the speed of light in some expt over in Geneva, but wasn't the writing on the wall for a big hunk of Einstein's stuff the moment that quantum entanglement began to be proposed?
_________________
http://jhfv.blogspot.co.uk/
....and the glory of the world becomes less than it was....
'Have we not served you well'
'Of course - you know you have.'
'Then let it end.'
We are the Bloodguard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Posts: 41528
Thanks: 47
Thanked 72 Times in 71 Posts
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
7297 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Murrin wrote: | Schroedinger's Cat teaches us that quantum uncertainty is absurd.
Unfortunately for Schroedinger, it also appears to be true. |
 Exactly.
--A
_________________
Don't believe everything you think.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vraith
you're Dark Blue, stained..
Joined: 21 Nov 2008
Posts: 6387
Thanks: 15
Thanked 59 Times in 57 Posts
Location: everywhere, all the time
12611 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zarathustra wrote: | | Quantum objects don't have definite properties prior to measurement, they merely have probabilities of having certain measured properties. They aren't just uncertain, they are indeterminate, due to their wavelike nature and behavior. |
there may be a better thread and quote to attach this to, but I'm too lazy to do a bunch of searching, and this is kinda sorta close enough...the dual nature/indeterminancy/quantum may be getting closer and closer to us:
apparently it extends, at least in some cases, beyond the tiny/particle level, up to the pretty large molecular level [114 atoms]
http://news.yahoo.com/largest-molecules-yet-behave-waves-quantum-double-slit-184107270.html
_________________
The ONLY value of universal characters is that they help us, by reasoning, to know new truths about individual things.
I always had a repulsive need to be something more than human.
I just want something I can never have.
As was his language so was his life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hashi Lebwohl
Director of Data Acquisition
Joined: 06 Jul 2009
Posts: 3495
Thanks: 11
Thanked 52 Times in 48 Posts
Location: UMCPHQ
12475 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
 
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fascinating. I wonder how large a molecule has to be before it stops causing interference patterns, at which point it does not demonstrate wave-like behavior? If we can find that mass, then we have a limit below which quantum behavior is dominant and above which classical behavior is dominant. The research would then focus on the barrier itself, trying to design things take can take advantage of quantum behavior on a classical scale.
_________________
No matter how thinly you slice it, it's still bologna.
What is the secret of Zen? Burn all your Zen books.
If you can't handle losing then you don't deserve to win.
| Don Exnihilote wrote: | | Hashi, if you thought you were wrong at times, evidently you were mistaken. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I'm Murrin
But just as tasty.
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Posts: 13199
Thanks: 6
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
Location: North East, UK
5928 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Hashi Lebwohl
Director of Data Acquisition
Joined: 06 Jul 2009
Posts: 3495
Thanks: 11
Thanked 52 Times in 48 Posts
Location: UMCPHQ
12475 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Haven't they recently detected fullerenes in space? I remember being introduced to them in organic chemistry...back in 1988. I have forgotten more chemistry than most people will ever know, sadly.
_________________
No matter how thinly you slice it, it's still bologna.
What is the secret of Zen? Burn all your Zen books.
If you can't handle losing then you don't deserve to win.
| Don Exnihilote wrote: | | Hashi, if you thought you were wrong at times, evidently you were mistaken. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vraith
you're Dark Blue, stained..
Joined: 21 Nov 2008
Posts: 6387
Thanks: 15
Thanked 59 Times in 57 Posts
Location: everywhere, all the time
12611 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 8:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hashi Lebwohl wrote: | | Haven't they recently detected fullerenes in space? I remember being introduced to them in organic chemistry...back in 1988. I have forgotten more chemistry than most people will ever know, sadly. |
it's in both regular soot, and in deep space IIRC. [yep, just checked M's wiki link, and it says so]. On a somewhat related [really have to stretch in a certain way to make that claim] I also saw recently that in at least some circumstances they can "trick" electrons...a concept that one of the Big B writers [probably Benford] used in a book years ago..."tricking" particles so inertia didn't apply was the prime thing IIRC.
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-03/new-molecular-graphene-produces-suite-designer-electrons-future-devices
_________________
The ONLY value of universal characters is that they help us, by reasoning, to know new truths about individual things.
I always had a repulsive need to be something more than human.
I just want something I can never have.
As was his language so was his life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peter
unfettered
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Posts: 1758
Thanks: 29
Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts
7122 White Gold Dollars
Tokens
HP
User Items:
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Avatar wrote: | | Murrin wrote: | Schroedinger's Cat teaches us that quantum uncertainty is absurd.
Unfortunately for Schroedinger, it also appears to be true. |
Exactly.
--A |
Schrodinger knew this though. I think I mentioned in another post that on one occasion he gave a talk where he almost had to apoligetically admit that the likelyhood was that his equations were true (as opposed to the Copenhagen Interpretation's version of quantum theory).
_________________
http://jhfv.blogspot.co.uk/
....and the glory of the world becomes less than it was....
'Have we not served you well'
'Of course - you know you have.'
'Then let it end.'
We are the Bloodguard |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
Home
Memberlist
Register
Search
Profile
FAQ
Statistics
Sudoku
Phoogle Map
Album
Stores
Log in
